General Expert Overview
Ivan Gretskiy and Mohamed Safwat present an intriguing matchup, with Gretskiy’s powerful baseline play contrasting against Safwat’s tactical finesse. Given the historical data and current form, this match could see intense rallies and strategic exchanges. The odds suggest a high probability of a close contest, with both players capable of pushing each other to the limits. The betting lines reflect expectations of a tightly contested first set and potentially a match decided over three sets.
Gretskiy, Ivan
Safwat,Mohamed
(FT)
Predictions:
| Market | Prediction | Odd | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 1st Set Games | 71.70% | (2-0) | |
| Under 1st Set Games | 57.00% | (2-0) | |
| Tie Break in 1st Set (No) | 95.50% | (2-0) | |
| Under 2.5 Sets | 77.10% | (2-0) | |
| Tie Break in Match (No) | 60.10% | (2-0) | |
| Total Games 2-Way (Over 22.5) | 56.40% | (2-0) | |
| Total Games 3-Way (Under 22) | 57.80% | (2-0) |
Betting List Analysis
1st Set Games
The over 1st set games at 68.00 indicates expectations of a longer first set, possibly due to both players’ defensive capabilities and stamina. Conversely, the under at 56.20 suggests a belief that one player may dominate early, leading to a quicker conclusion.
Tie Break in 1st Set
The odds of no tie break in the first set at 93.00 imply confidence in one player breaking serve decisively, avoiding the need for a tiebreak. This could be influenced by either player’s recent performance on crucial points or service games.
Number of Sets
With under 2.5 sets at 76.80, there’s anticipation of either a swift straight-sets victory or a decisive third-set conclusion. This reflects the potential for either player to seize momentum and secure an early advantage.
Tie Break in Match
The no tie break in match odds at 65.10 suggest confidence in one player maintaining their level throughout, avoiding any decisive tiebreaks. This could be due to perceived mental toughness or superior court positioning.
Total Games Predictions
The total games 2-way (over 22.5) at 55.30 versus under 22 at 56.30 presents a close call. This reflects the expectation of either a tight contest with extended rallies or efficient play leading to fewer total games.