Skip to main content
Главная страница » Football » Corluspor 1947 vs Cankaya FK

Corluspor 1947 vs Cankaya FK

Expert Overview: Corluşpor 1947 vs Cankaya FK

The upcoming match between Corluşpor 1947 and Cankaya FK is anticipated to be a tactical battle, with both teams focusing on defense in the first half. The odds suggest a strong likelihood that neither team will score in the first half, with the away team particularly favored not to concede. However, the second half is expected to see more activity, with predictions indicating a higher probability of goals being scored by both teams. Overall, the match is forecasted to have an average total of 2.40 goals.

Corluspor 1947

DLLWD
-

Cankaya FK

DLLWL
Date: 2025-12-07
Time: 12:00
(FT)
Venue: Not Available Yet
Score: 1-1

Predictions:

MarketPredictionOddResult
Away Team Not To Score In 1st Half98.50%(1-1)
Both Teams Not To Score In 1st Half98.60%(1-1)
Away Team To Score In 2nd Half78.90%(1-1)
Over 1.5 Goals69.20%(1-1) 1.22
Home Team Not To Score In 1st Half58.60%(1-1)
Home Team To Score In 2nd Half63.00%(1-1)
Over 2.5 Goals58.90%(1-1) 1.73
Sum of Goals 2 or 362.10%(1-1)
Both Teams To Score60.90%(1-1) 1.85
Avg. Total Goals2.80%(1-1)
Avg. Conceded Goals2.80%(1-1)
Avg. Goals Scored2.30%(1-1)

Betting Predictions

First Half Analysis

  • Away Team Not To Score In 1st Half: 98.60
  • Both Teams Not To Score In 1st Half: 98.30
  • Home Team Not To Score In 1st Half: 58.20

Second Half Predictions

  • Away Team To Score In 2nd Half: 78.30
  • Home Team To Score In 2nd Half: 59.50
  • Both Teams To Score: 60.40

Total Goals Forecast

  • Over 1.5 Goals: 67.50
  • Over 2.5 Goals: 62.70
  • Sum of Goals (2 or 3): 62.70
  • Avg. Total Goals: 2.40
  • Avg. Conceded Goals: 2.40
  • Avg. Goals Scored: 1.90

The data suggests a cautious approach for both teams in the opening period, with potential for increased offensive efforts post-half-time.

Additionamauriciofarias/terraform-aws-vpc-peering/modules/vpc_peering/variables.tf variable “name” { } variable “vpc_id” { } variable “peer_vpc_id” { } variable “tags” { } mauriciofarias/terraform-aws-vpc-peering<|file_sep#!/usr/bin/env bash set -e # Get current directory DIR="$( cd "$( dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}" )" && pwd )" # Get all files from .tf files from current dir FILES=$(find $DIR/../ -name "*.tf") # Change into modules dir cd $DIR/../modules # Loop through each file and remove terraform lockfile for f in $FILES; do rm -f $f/.terraform.lock.hcl done cd $DIR/../ terraform init –reconfigure terraform validatemauriciofarias/terraform-aws-vpc-peering /dev/null echo “Uploading module…” aws s3 cp vpc_peering.zip s3://$MODULE_BUCKET_NAME/vpc_peering/vpc_peering.zip > /dev/nullmauriciofarias/terraform-aws-vpc-peering<|file_sep working_directory = "/tmp" environment { ENVIRONMENT = var.environment } before_hook = [ "./hooks/pre_apply.sh", ] after_hook = [ "./hooks/post_apply.sh", ]mauriciofarias/terraform-aws-vpc-peering v[“hostname”] } # If there is no response for a given IP, it will be set to null. }<|file_sep**IMPORTANT NOTE** The following configuration requires you to manually modify your Terraform state file as follows: { … "resources": [ … { … "type": "tls_private_key", … "instances": [ { … sensitive_value: "” } ], … }, … } This has been done because I am using an insecure version of Terraform and so cannot use `sensitive` values. — This repo contains a simple Terraform configuration which provisions an AWS VPC with: * An Internet Gateway (IGW) * A Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) * A Virtual Private Gateway (VGW) * A Customer Gateway (CGW) * A VPN Connection between VGW and CGW using L2TP/IPSEC over IKEv2 protocol * A Route Table associated with the VPC’s private subnet that routes traffic via the VPN Connection towards CGW’s public IP address. * A NAT gateway within the public subnet associated with its own Route Table that routes traffic towards IGW. * Two Security Groups: * One associated with all resources within the VPC allowing SSH access from anywhere on port `22` * One associated with all resources within the VPC allowing TCP traffic on port `443` only from a specific IP address range (`10.x.x.x`) * One associated with all resources within the VPC allowing TCP traffic on port `80` only from anywhere (`0.0.0.0/0`) A few notes about this configuration: * The NAT gateway is deployed within a single public subnet. * All private subnets are associated with a single Route Table that routes all outbound traffic via VPN Connection towards Customer Gateway’s public IP address. **NOTE:** This configuration creates resources which incur cost in AWS. — ## Setup Instructions ### Pre-requisites: To run this configuration you need: * An AWS account (create one here: https://portal.aws.amazon.com/billing/signup#/start) * The AWS CLI installed locally: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/cli/latest/userguide/install-cliv2.html * An IAM user configured locally via `~/.aws/config`. You can create one here: https://console.aws.amazon.com/iam/home?region=us-east-1#/users/create?step=details&accessKey=lastStep&userName= **NOTE:** Make sure you configure your region appropriately in your `~/.awsrc/config` file. ### Configuration Variables: You can find them at `./variables.tfvars`. **NOTE:** You must change these variables before running this configuration! ### Run Configuration: You can run this configuration by executing `./run.sh`. This script will perform some sanity checks before provisioning your infrastructure. If you don’t want to provision your infrastructure just yet but instead would like to see what changes would be made run `./run.sh plan`. If you want to destroy everything you’ve provisioned run `./destroy.sh`. mauriciofarias/terraform-aws-vpc-peering0 then returning either true or false accordingly. For example consider this line below which tries counting number of elements contained within array variable named gateways assuming its length greater than zero i.e., len(gateways)>0 then returning either true or false accordingly. count=”len(gateways)>0″ count=”len(gateways)>0″ However notice what gets returned back after compilation process has finished compiling code block shown above… However notice what gets returned back after compilation process has finished compiling code block shown above… ![alt text](images/count_compiled.png) Notice according image above shows us code block returned back looks nothing like original code block specified above since now its composed entirely outta conditional expressions nested within each other resulting in rather ugly looking mess once compiled down completely… Notice according image above shows us code block returned back looks nothing like original code block specified above since now its composed entirely outta conditional expressions nested within each other resulting in rather ugly looking mess once compiled down completely… So while counts may appear more flexible than requires at first glance, So while counts may appear more flexible than requires at first glance, its flexibility comes at cost i.e., unintuitive behavior making things difficult understand especially if unfamiliar wih underlying syntax rules used by compiler underneath covers… its flexibility comes at cost i.e., unintuitive behavior making things difficult understand especially if unfamiliar wih underlying syntax rules used by compiler underneath covers… whereas requiring explicit boolean values makes things easy understand right away… whereas requiring explicit boolean values makes things easy understand right away… one caveat however remains though… one caveat however remains though… what happens when condition returns neither true nor false e.g., condition returns integer such as zero… what happens when condition returns neither true nor false e.g., condition returns integer such as zero… in case were dealing wth counts instead requries obviously won’t have problem cause condition returning non-zero integer evaluates truthy meaning whatever resource were trying instantiate gets instantiated anyways… in case were dealing wth counts instead requries obviously won’t have problem cause condition returning non-zero integer evaluates truthy meaning whatever resource were trying instantiate gets instantiated anyways… however situation becomes slightly trickier wth regards requries cause requirement being anything other than strictly true means requirement evaluated falsy meaning resource wont get instantiated anyways… however situation becomes slightly trickier wth regards requries cause requirement being anything other than strictly true means requirement evaluated falsy meaning resource wont get instantiated anyways… so basically whenever possible try avoid relying solely on counts unless absolutely necessary e.g., needing specific number instances instantiated e.g., len(vpcs)>1… otherwise try stick wth requries wherever possible whenever possible… so basically whenever possible try avoid relying solely on counts unless absolutely necessary e.g., needing specific number instances instantiated e.g., len(vpcs)>1… otherwise try stick wth requries wherever possible whenever possible… also remember requirements shouldnt ever depend upon any kind external input unless absolutely necessary otherwise risk introducing unwanted side effects e.g., requirement evaluating truthy based upon input provided by user potentially causing resource instantiation unintendedly… also remember requirements shouldnt ever depend upon any kind external input unless absolutely necessary otherwise risk introducing unwanted side effects e.g., requirement evaluating truthy based upon input provided by user potentially causing resource instantiation unintendedly… always keep requirements simple straightforward clear concise avoid complex conditional expressions involving external inputs whenever possible else risk introducing unexpected behavior difficult debug later on… always keep requirements simple straightforward clear concise avoid complex conditional expressions involving external inputs whenever possible else risk introducing unexpected behavior difficult debug later on… for example consider following scenario… for example consider following scenario… suppose were trying instantiate network interface resource requiring specific instance id supplied externally somehow somehow possibly thru command line argument passed thru cli tool maybe… suppose were trying instantiate network interface resource requiring specific instance id supplied externally somehow somehow possibly thru command line argument passed thru cli tool maybe… and suppose were relying solely on count expression counting number elements contained array variable named interfaces assuming its length greater than zero e.g., len(interfaces)>0 then evaluating truthiness accordingly… and suppose were relying solely on count expression counting number elements contained array variable named interfaces assuming its length greater than zero e.g., len(interfaces)>0 then evaluating truthiness accordingly… but suppose user providing invalid instance id somehow causing interfaces array variable becoming empty thus causing len(interfaces)==zero thus making expression evaluate falsy resulting unintentional failure instantiation network interface resource… but suppose user providing invalid instance id somehow causing interfaces array variable becoming empty thus causing len(interfaces)==zero thus making expression evaluate falsy resulting unintentional failure instantiation network interface resource… so basically best practice generally speaking should always strive keeping requirements simple avoiding unnecessary complexity wherever possible else risk introducing unintended side effects hard debug later… so basically best practice generally speaking should always strive keeping requirements simple avoiding unnecessary complexity wherever possible else risk introducing unintended side effects hard debug later… always keep requirements straightforward clear concise minimizing reliance external inputs reducing potential risks unforeseen consequences unexpected behavior easier maintain debug going forward time saving headaches troubleshooting issues less likely occur preventable mistakes made upfront better overall quality software produced end result achieved desired outcome successfully meeting expectations stakeholders involved satisfied happy end users too hopefully enjoy experience seamless troublefree operation smooth functioning reliable performance consistently delivering optimal results every time without fail guarantee satisfaction confidence assurance trust faith belief integrity credibility reputation upheld maintained preserved protected safeguarded cherished valued treasured respected honored esteemed admired revered cherished beloved loved adored cherished forevermore eternally unendingly perpetually indefinitely everlasting ceaselessly continuously constantly regularly frequently often habitually usually normally typically ordinarily commonly generally everyday standard usual normal typical ordinary commonplace regular usual standard normal typical ordinary common general everyday routine customary conventional traditional habitual regular frequent frequent frequent frequent frequent frequent frequent frequent usual normal typical ordinary commonplace regular usual standard normal typical ordinary common general everyday routine customary conventional traditional habitual regular frequent frequent frequent frequent frequent freqeuent freqeuent freqeuent freqeuent freqeuent frequency frequency frequency frequency frequency frequency frequency frequency frequencccy frequencccy frequencccy frequencccy frequencccy frequencccy frequencccy frequencccy frequencyc frequencyc frequencyc frequencyc frequencies frequencies frequencies frequencies frequencies frequencies frequencies frequencies frequencies frequencies frequencies frequencies frequently frequently frequently frequently frequently frequently frequently frequently frequently frequently frequently mauriciofarias/terraform-aws-vpc-peering&2 “ERROR! JQ must be installed”; exit; fi; if [[ $(which aws) == “” ]];then echo >&2 “ERROR! AWS CLI must be installed”; exit; fi; mkdir ./packaged_modules/ PACKAGED_MODULES=$(ls ./packaged_modules) if [[ “$PACKAGED_MODULES” != “” ]];then rm -rf ./packaged_modules/*; fi; PACKAGED_MODULES=$(ls ./packaged_modules) if [[ “$PACKAGED_MODULES” == “” ]];then echo >&2 “33[31mNo packaged module found!33[00m”; exit; fi; for m in $(ls ./packaged_modules);do if [[ $(cat “./packaged_modules/$m/version.txt”) == “” ]];then echo >&2 “33[31mVersion info missing!33[00m”; exit; fi; if [[ $(cat “./packaged_modules/$m/version.txt”) =~ ^[[:digit:]]{1,}.[[:digit:]]{1,}.[[:digit:]]{1,}$ ]];then : else echo >&2 “33[31mInvalid version format!33[00m”; exit; fi; done; echo “” echo “” echo “” for m in $(ls ./packaged_modules);do echo “” echo “33[36mpackaging $MODULE_BUCKET_NAME/$m33[00m” echo “” cp “./packaged_modules/$m/”{*,version.txt} “./$MODULE_BUCKET_NAME/$m/” rm “./$MODULE_BUCKET_NAME/$m/version.txt” mkdir -p “./$MODULE_BUCKET_NAME/$m/” cd “./$MODULE_BUCKET_NAME/$m/” tar cfz “../$M.tar.gz” * rm ../$M* cd “../../..” done; rm -rf ./temp/* mkdir ./temp/ cp -R “$MODULE_BUCKET_NAME/”{*,}* “./temp/” cd temp/ tar cfz “../$MODULE_BUCKET_NAME.tar.gz” * cd .. rm temp/* rm “$MODULE_BUCKET_NAME/”{*,}* mv temp/”$MODULE_BUCKET_NAME.tar.gz” . rm packaged_modules/* AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID=$AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY=$AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY AWS_DEFAULT_REGION=$AWS_DEFAULT_REGION jq –arg MODULES_FILE tarball.json ‘.Modules |= (. + [$ARGS.named]) | .[] |= (.Name |= $env.MODULES_FILE)’ –arg NAME “$MODULE_BUCKET_NAME.tar.gz” –arg VERSION “$(cat temp/version.txt)” –arg DESCRIPTION “$(cat temp/readme.md)” –slurp-file S3_URLS temp/* | jq –arg NAME “$MODULE_BUCKET_NAME.tar.gz” –arg VERSION “$(cat temp/version.txt)” –arg DESCRIPTION “$(cat temp/readme.md)” ‘.Modules += [$ARGS.named]’ | jq ‘.’ > bucket.json && jq ‘.Modules[] | select(.Name==”‘$NAME'”).Version |= .+ “‘$(cat temp/version.txt)'” | .Modules[] | select(.Name==”‘$NAME'”).S3URLs += [‘$S3_URL’]’ bucket.json > tmp.json && mv tmp.json bucket.json && jq ‘.Modules[] | select(.Name==”‘$NAME'”).Description |= “‘”$DESCRIPTION”‘”‘ bucket.json > tmp.json && mv tmp.json bucket.json && curl –location –request PUT ‘$ENDPOINT_URL/buckets/'”$BUCKET_ID”‘/'”$REVISION_ID”‘/'”$NAME”‘?version=’$VERSION” -H ‘Content-Type: application/json;charset=utf8;’ –data-binary “@bucket.json”; mv bucket.json ./ mv version.txt ./ mv readme.md ./ rm “$MODULE_BUCKET_NAME”/{*,}* && rmdir “$MODULE_BUCKET_NAME”mauriciofarias/terraform-aws-vpc-peering<|file_sep ![Alt text](images/deployment_graph.png) ![Alt text](images/output_variables.png)

![Alt text](images/cidrs.png)

![Alt text](images/subnets.png)

![Alt text](images/security_groups.png)

![Alt text](images/route_tables.png)


## Usage Example ## You can find usage examples here: [usage_examples](usage_examples). The simplest way would probably involve copying/pasting contents found here [usage_examples/simple_example/main.tf](usage_examples/simple_example/main.tf), [usage_examples/simple_example/main_test.go](usage_examples/simple_example/main_test.go), [usage_examples/simple_example/main_test_output.log](usage_examples/simple_example/main_test_output.log), [usage_examples/simple_example/run.sh](usage_examples/simple_example/run.sh), [usage_examples/simple_example/setup.sh](usage_examples/simple_example/setup.sh), & [usage_examples/simple_example/tests.sh](usage_examples/simple_example/tests.sh) over top existing ones.

If you’d rather setup everything manually yourself copy/paste contents found here [setup_shells/setup_shells/common_setup.sh](setup_shells/common_setup.sh), [setup_shells/setup_shells/common_setup_output.log](setup_shells/common_setup_output.log), & [setup_shells/setup_shells/common_tests_output.log](setup_shells/common_tests_output.log) over top existing ones.

Then copy/paste contents found here [setup_shells/setup_shells/setup_env_vars.sh](setup_shells/setup_env_vars.sh), [setup_shells/setup_env_vars_output.log](setup_shells/setup_env_vars_output.log), & setup_shell_tests_output.log([setup_shell_tests_output.log)] setup_shell_tests_output.log) over top existing ones.

Next copy/paste contents found here setup_shell_templates/[main_tf_template.tpl.envvars_main_tf.template.jinja][setup_shell_templates/main_tf_template.tpl.envvars_main_tf.template.jinja], setup_shell_templates/[main_tf_template.tpl.envvars_main_tf.template.jinja.output][setup_shell_templates/main_tf_template.tpl.envvars_main_tf.template.jinja.output], & setup_shell_templates/[main_test_go_template.tpl.envvars_main_test.go.template.jinja][setup_shell_templates/main_test_go_template.tpl.envvars_main_test.go.template.jinja]) over top existing ones.

Now run bash setup_env_vars.

Finally copy/paste contents found here run_shell_templates/[run_tpl.envvars_run_tpl.output][run_shell_templates/run_tpl.envvars_run_tpl.output], run_shell_templates/[tests_tpl.envvars_tests_tpl.output][run_shell_templates/tests_tpl.envvars_tests_tpl.output], & run_shell_templates/[run_tpl.envvars_run_tpl.template.jinja][run_shell_templates/run_tpl.envvars_run_tpl.template.jinja]) over top existing ones.

Now run bash setup_run followed by bash setup_tests.

## Building Modules ## To build all packages call make build_all_packages.
To build individual packages call make build_package_“, replacing “ package name listed below:
build_package_bastion_host_for_ssh_access_into_private_subnet_in_virtual_private_cloud_within_virtual_private_cloud_with_public_subnet_and_internet_gateway_attached_to_it_using_remote_state_data_source_and_static_configuration_files_using_custom_provider_plugin_for_hashi_corp_terra_form_written_in_golang_with_basic_functionality_provided_by_grunt_work_io_testing_library_for_go__go_mod_version_control_tool_and_make_build_tool__with_jenkins_continuous_integration_pipeline_enabled__using_custom_providers_plug_ins_for_hashi_corp_tools_written_in_golang_using_grunt_work_io_testing_library_for_golang_and_make_build_tool__with_jenkins_continuous_integration_pipeline_enabled_ build_package_bastion_host_for_ssh_access_into_private_subnet_in_virtual_private_cloud_within_virtual_private_cloud_with_public_subnet_and_internet_gateway_attached_to_it_using_remote_state_data_source_and_static_configuration_files_using_custom_provider_plugin_for_hashi_corp_terra_form